Any idea on how this will compare with the Voigtlaender 50mm f1.2? With 400 gram I would not call it light but it is much lighter than the competition. 85. I don’t know whether 7Artisans contacted you or not, but I saw your shot on their promo page without credit: https://www.7artisans.com/en/h-col-152.html, I was pretty tempted to jump on one of these, but TTArtisan just told me on Facebook that the 50mm 0,95 will go on sale before July, so I’ll keep waiting and scratching my superfast itch with the 75/1.25 in the meantime . The lens is balanced very well on my A7ii and together they are a nice and small package. (the GOOD service) 02 01N FAST SERVICE GOOD GOOD SERVICE CHEAP WON'T BE CHEAP WON'T BE FAST 02 01 JUST 3 DAYS, DON'T WANT HURRY UP! You're offline. Is this based on actual testing? It also is like half a stop slower at 1.5 vs 1.4, but Come on, you can try harder than that. 24.65 $21.46-38 % FIFA 21 EN/PL Languages Only Origin CD Key. The 7Artisans 50mm f/1.1 is a very cheap super fast 50 mm lens that hit the market in 2017. These lenses are also more versatile with much, much better stopped down across the frame sharpness (near infinity). However. But not so much of a bargain compared to normal J3 After shooting the 7A for a while I were really surprised than did side-by side test with my J3: the difference is mainly in contrast, the sharpness is a mixed bag with 7A leading in the centre and J3 elsewhere…. This is possibly the effect of the thick Sony filter stack, at Leica bodies this problem might be absent or at least much less prominent. Comment document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a58800ec1fe6e1c7d0ff22eda3c1161d" );document.getElementById("a6d7300980").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); My name is Juriaan, I am a passionate photographer from the Netherlands. (Sound familiar?) 49.34 $36.36-12 % Fall Guys Steam CD Key. Considering its MFD of 70 cm a close focus adapter like this one would give you more flexibility. One key point: There’s no universal standard for quality. Contrast can be lowered significantly as well with a light source in the frame. 80. STAR WARS: Squadrons EN/PL Languages Only Origin CD Key. Indeed not on full area, mostly in middle and around but still…. The 7Artisans comes in Leica M mount, to use it on an a7 series body one needs an Leica M to Sony E adapter. Find out what you can get for around $500 or less as we highlight the best budget smartphones. However I think if you have a tight budget and like this sort of rendering, it is a good option for a more than fair price . Also for portraiture it is much fun to use and it delivers good results. Quality is the fourth part of the project triangle. Changing other tasks might not shorten the schedule, but changing critical path tasks will. The price of only $370 makes it very attractive for those who want a super fast lens but have a limited budget, but how well does it perform? Nice review. In the center bokeh still looks very good from f/1.4 on, but towards the edges bokeh is quite busy. The lens is made from metal and glass only and feels very dense. Remember the old saying “You get what you pay for”? 100% crops of center, midframe and extreme corner. Coma correction is really, really bad. (Either way it doesn’t matter much since the lens is fuzzy in the corners under any condition.) To add features to a product (scope), you could extend the deadline to make time for the new work (time) or add people to get it done faster (cost). This is one of the reasons I continue to shoot Nikon D series lenses. Hi Juriaan, Often, the fixed elements of a project are dictated from above the project manager, but not always. I have this lens, I really love small size and weight compared to mitakon for example (also have it). There is only a handful of lenses ~1,2f or faster out there with more then 10 aperture blades and all of those cost at least 3 times more than this one. With this additional time and scope, the end result might be a better product. Sharpness at portrait distance from f/1.4. The two are quite different in rendering, particularly contrast and bokeh (J3 is less contrasty, especially when there’s any amount of stray light). Fourth, finish the project and celebrate! To finish the project under budget (cost), you could get rid of overtime and finish the project later (time) or cut features (scope). I bought this lens out of curiosity, but decided not to sell it even if I also have J3 (and a decent one). Please register to post and access all features, it's quick, easy and FREE! Hardware and software. If it’s cheap and good, it won’t be fast. The lens does come with nice metal cap, a hood is absent though. it is not a L-mount version – it is a M-mount version with a L-mount modifikation. It’s a great combination. Extend the deadline to allow time for all tasks with the current level of resources (time). Luckily at portrait distances vignetting is quite a bit less. If it’s fast and good, it won’t be cheap. For full body portraits and infinity work only the very center of the image is usable and if this is what you do often this is not a lens for you. Off center sharpness seems to be much better especially at longer distances. The Sonnar design origin is questionable in my opinion. Sooner or later, you’ll face a project that’s set to overshoot an inflexible deadline. Verify that the resources are the best fit for the job. If you want to experiment with more creative photography and play with different renderings and thin depth of field, try this one. Hi Adolfo, David reviewed in on the blog here: https://phillipreeve.net/blog/carl-zeiss-c-sonnar-t-50mm-f1-5-zm-a-detailed-review/ At f/1.1 LoCA is very pronounced and hard to correct. I use my D series lenses even more than Nikon’s G 1.8 series. I hope you guys review more Samyang/Rokinon lenses as a 45mm 1.8 is supposedly coming. Here are the best cheap phones for those on a tight budget. Second, figure out which sides of the triangle you can change and which are “fixed” in place. I haven’t done many projects that demand a “cheap and fast” product, but I think library music falls under this sometimes. Image quality is much better though. The following two tabs change content below. In most projects, the largest chunk of the budget consists of resource costs: the rate-based and fixed costs of people, equipment, and materials. 2.3 meters, focused at the subject and refocused for every photo: 1.3 meters, focused at the subject and refocused for every photo. Comparing to the Voigtländer Nokton 50mm f/1.5 VM, the 7Artisans falls far behind. When they hit though, they often produce a particular look that I like. side and the problem side are different, don’t give up. and you want one for portraiture without breaking your bank I would certainly consider the 7Artisans 1.1/50! How does the bokeh compare half body portraits with you sample, is blur also significantly less towards the corners? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. All in all sharpness is sufficient for portrait applications and MFD work. fixed I'm wondering where it actually originated. Thanks! How? WELL DONE, GOOD JOB! Stopping down to f/1.4 however makes a huge difference: the rainbow artifacts are gone now and the red flare is usually less pronounced. Another way is doing a test at infinity. I absolutely love the lens for taking pictures of details in nature like flowers, its rendering and the thin depth of field help a lot with creating unique images. “You can have it good, fast, or cheap. At 2 m it is 3.1 stops at f/1.1, at MFD (0.7 m) vignetting is 2.5 stops at f/1.1. In the box were also included: a self adhesive focus tab and a screw driver+chart to calibrate it when using this lens on a rangefinder camera. It’s not sharp compared to other 50mm lenses I have, but with f/1.1, it’s quite fun to use. Advertisement. 49.34 $34.11-48 % Risk of Rain 2 Steam CD Key. The project might be in trouble, but at least you know it’s in trouble and you have a good starting point to rethink the project’s goals or quality standards. Bokeh is often quite harsh and not as nice as the 50/1.1 is from f/1.4. "Good, fast, cheap. Meanwhile, I have a 7A 50 1.1 by myself, but in the L-mount version to connect it to the Leica SL and I really like the results, the bokeh and the colors. Develop something quickly and cheaply, but it will not be of high quality 3. ZHONG YI MITAKON 50MM 0.95 DARK KNIGHT I found other optical designs that show more resemblance: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/63619952 And you really need to be clear on this for when problems show up (and they always do). Still, with the sun in certain positions you will often catch an orange flare in the corners as you can see below. All the best. I went looking for another hood…. Sample pictures I have seen so far from the Zenitar do not look like it is sharper or better rendering that the old Mitakon 50 0.95 II. Foreground bokeh is not up to my taste, subjects look unsharp but keep their shape. Your IP: 151.80.234.16 The focus ring has a very nice resistance and feels great, though the focus throw is very short and only about 45 degrees. Stopping down to f/1.4 reduces vignetting to 3 stops, at f/2 it is 2.5 stops and at f/2.8 still 2 stops. “Jim Jarmusch once told me Fast, Cheap, and Good… pick two. GILETTE X SPECTRUM SCIENCE: Mach 3 Animations. (the FAST service] (the CHEAP service) 03 03 FAST SERVICE CHEAP WON'T BE GOOD GOOD service CHEAP won't be FAST UNDER-RATED.IT GOOD service FAST won't be CHEAP FAST service CHEAP … Sometimes the project scope can’t change, so you have to take other actions: Add resources to make sure all tasks are completed (cost). A project manager needs to know how quality is defined for the organization and the specific project. I have re-checked once again with focus on a landscape at infinity and then focus bracketing ten times from infinity to 1 meter. Replace an expensive resource with a less expensive one. Background is also much more blurred at f/1.5 with the 7Artisans than the Nokton, so if shallow depth of field and blurred background is important the 7Artisans wins easily even at the same f-stop. I found that from f/1.4 busyness and flare were decreased in such extend it really makes a difference, although differences are visible well at f/1.2 and 1.3. In most projects, at least one side of the triangle is fixed in place. The lens is made from metal and glass only and feels very dense. If budget is no problem I think the Voigtländer is a much more versatile option. That might be the definition of quality for that project in your company. I found a lot of field curvature and tested repeatedly ad several distances. If you like the Sonnar rendering and/or very thin depth of field but you cannot justify the more expensive alternatives, this might be the lens for you. (I have original A7). Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. And since the sun just outside the frame usually is not much of a problem, the absence of a lens hood is not that big of a deal.